In 1804, dueling was still alive and well in the United
States and still followed the European rules. I found a cool link to these
rules on a PBS site.
My favorite one is:
Rule 15. Challenges are
never to be delivered at night, unless the party to be challenged intend
leaving the place of offense before morning; for it is desirable to avoid all
hot-headed proceedings.
This seems very sensible. No
sense in killing someone over something said while under the influence of a
good bottle of Claret! However, I might have extended this rule a bit further
as Hamilton’s inflammatory statements about Burr were supposedly said at a
dinner party. Furthermore, Burr didn’t hear about them directly, but through
letters from another gentleman who had been in attendance. Hamilton said he didn’t recall the incident
so refused to issue an apology.
Who knows if the actual
slights occurred? Burr was probably spoiling for a fight as Hamilton had been
instrumental in his defeat for President of the United States in 1800 and then later for Governor of the State of New York. This seems to be a case of "damned if
you do, damned if you don’t." If Hamilton apologized, his honor would have been
besmirched for something he may not (or may) have said. If he didn’t apologize…well
the rest is history.
A much younger Alexander Hamilton has a cameo role in LeChevalier where he serves as artillery captain under George Washington and is asked to help clear out Philadelphia in advance of the British invasion. (He did serve as an artillery captain under Washington) I wrote him as a much more appealing character than I think many history books lead us to believe. Everybody has two sides to their character and it's too easy to get lost in the melodrama of the historic and personal events that surround his life.
A much younger Alexander Hamilton has a cameo role in LeChevalier where he serves as artillery captain under George Washington and is asked to help clear out Philadelphia in advance of the British invasion. (He did serve as an artillery captain under Washington) I wrote him as a much more appealing character than I think many history books lead us to believe. Everybody has two sides to their character and it's too easy to get lost in the melodrama of the historic and personal events that surround his life.
MJ
No comments:
Post a Comment