For a lot of would-be authors, that is the question, isn’t
it?
Actually, it’s a relevant question for published authors as
well, but let’s take the would-be authors side of the coin today. With two
books published, I’m not all that far removed from those days.
When I got back into fiction writing four years ago, I
didn’t realize how many books were self-published. I must not have been paying
attention, I guess. I count myself lucky that I wasn’t.
The upside of self-publishing is huge. Sure, it’s a lot of
hard work, but you don’t have to share your royalties with a publisher who
takes forever to release your book and does little to no work to promote
it. (Sorry publishers, but that’s the
perception.)
What’s not to love about self-publishing?
Well, for one, you give up a prime opportunity to improve
your writing skills when you start out with self-publishing.
I have yet to meet a single author who doesn’t think they
are a cut above when it comes to writing.
You have to have at least a little bit of ego to be an author. It’s what
drives us to actually submit our stories.
But with self-publishing you have no one to critique your
stories, to point out your weaknesses, to show you how you could be better.
Your self-published story may sell a lot, but if you’re like most authors, it
probably won’t. Was it your story? Did you not promote it enough? Do you
totally suck at this business?
You may never know.
Yes, you can get reviews by people who both love and hate your
stories, but those are opinions. The reviewer may love your story or not, but
reviews aren’t detailed critiques of your writing ability – usually. They
certainly aren’t in the category of constructive criticism. They have nothing to gain by helping you become a better writer.
Your publisher does.
When you take the traditional publishing route, even the
rejection letters can give you additional insights into how to improve your
stories. Once you have a manuscript accepted, the editing process give you even
further insight into how to improve your writing craft: using strong verbs,
avoiding author intrusion, removing unnecessary backstory.
And chances are, you’ll learn something new from each new
editor you work with. Like authors (which many of them are) editors all have
their unique strengths. (And strange pet peeves, but that’s a topic for another post!)
As always, this is just my opinion. Whether you are a
would-be author considering self-publishing or a published author who has
answered the question “to self-publish or not to self-publish?” let us hear
from you.
MJ
No comments:
Post a Comment